The Puzzle of Personal Statements About Art

"Late February Night" painting in progress.  2/19/2014  by Lynn Whitlark

“Late February Night” painting in progress. 2/19/2014 by Lynn Whitlark

Originally posted several years ago — things have changed. And then, nothing has changed.  New content — and images of new art — added at the end.

7 BY THE SEA

I’ve spent a considerable amount of time lately listening to contemporary artists.

It’s a dizzying task.  The world is a crowded place these days — and art as a means of expression and an attempt to make contact has reached epidemic proportions.

Modern art began with the Impressionists.  Or about there.  Prior to the impressionists, artists painted classical subjects — basically, they either painted portraits, or they illustrated the Bible and a few other classic works of sacred literature including the classical mythologies.  But there came a day when artists in the throws of political revolution all around them decided to hold a little revolution of their own and paint from real life.  Instead of posed attempts at perfection, they started painting real people — warts and deformities and all. Then they started painting fleeting light. Fleeting smiles.  Fleeting glances  Fleeting life.  It was about the beauty of the moment. …

View original post 1,160 more words

Final Paintings for Fall ’10 Painting Class

So I enrolled in this class to break loose of the limiting decisions and unnecessary beliefs I’d been holding on to about art and painting.  I wanted to talk out some of the things I’d been tripping over, and I wanted to have a conversation with artists (in this case, graduate students working on their MFA degrees, and an instructor who has been painting and thinking about all this for 30+ years.

And to a great extent, it has worked.  If not for my art — at least for my head.  And, I think also for my art — at least a little.

Here are my last 2 paintings for the class.

Fallen Imprisoned, copyright 2010 by Lynn Whitlark. Carbon, vivianite, indanthrone blue, prussian blue on Arches Natural White cotton rag paper; 22" x 30", and natural 100% cotton muslin.

The first, called Fallen Imprisoned is the final painting in the “Imprisoned” series.  There is a painting on the surface — though it is very faint.  It is a shadow of the previous crouched figure.  Everything else on the painting is made of painted cloth.  The cloth doll figure, and the shreds of “his” (the doll’s) skin, swirling around him.

*            *            *             *              *             *             *              *           *             *              *

*            *            *             *              *             *             *              *           *             *              *

Agreement is Shared Tattoo, copyright 2010 by Lynn Whitlark. 140lb Arches Natural White hot press cotton rag paper. 16" x 20" Carbon, vivianite, and Derwent Inktense pencils.

The second painting is not part of the Imprisoned series.  It is something else.  The words between the face and the thigh say:

Agreement is shared tattoo

and the repeated single word ‘agreement’ appears 3 more times in other places on the paper.

Which is probably only going to make sense in the context of the Graves model of human development.  Tattoos have very specific purposes for L2 and L3 in the Graves Model.  These purposes — and the medium of the tattoo change at L4+L5, and then again at L6+L7.  This painting is an attempt to talk about the form, medium, and purpose of L8 tattoo.  Clear as mud, right?  Not a problem.  It’s just a painting.  The important thing is that our agreements are as indelible and unmistakable as a tattoo mark.  They identify us.  They make us recognizable to each other and to everyone else.

“Imprisoned” Barely Nomic Painting w/ 7 Images

This is the starting image of the cover, still closed and covered.

Imprisoned Closed Cover, Copyright 2010 Lynn Whitlark; 22" x 30". 400lb Arches cotton rag paper, and treated canvas mesh.

Okay.  So this is a project for the graduate level painting/art class I’m taking.  I don’t have the undergrad degree in art or BFA that these guys have (many of them are 1 or 2 semesters away from an MFA) — so I don’t know what undergrads do compared to what grad students do.

I have no idea (still) how to put my stuff in the room with their stuff — they all do different kinds of things for different kinds of reasons.

But the prof. asks me to do art that represents the way the inside of my head works.

I’d told him about nomics.  Graves.  Particle physics.  Matching and mismatching.  Timeline therapy.  Hypnosis.  You know.  Some of the stuff that rattles around in my head.

So this is the first attempt to do that.  It’s a little bit nomic.  Mostly it’s about opening boxes — which I haven’t ever mentioned to the prof. (so far)  And it also works as the visual test for the meta-program: matching/mismatching sort.

For the curious, the inscription on the last image (which I photographed poorly) says:

Just the thought
of opening the box
is enough
to break the seal

This collection of images opens like a book — or a pop-up book.  Closed, it measures 22″ x 30″.  Fully opened, the book part is 30″ x 42″, with a drop down piece that is 22″ x 14″, and a separate, stand-alone piece that is 18″ x 24″.  Pigments used include Indanthrone Blue; Carbon soot; ground Amathyst;, Unbleached Titanium, Prussian Blue; Green Earth; Lapis Lazuli; Pyramidazolone Yellow, Phthalo Green (B); and ground Vivianite.

At any give stage in the opening, between 2 and 4 images are visible (out of a total of 7.)

Rebecca’s Doll Painting and Other Dolls

I did this one about 3 years ago — but it’s been at Rebecca’s for a year or so — and I forgot to take get an image of it.

The upper pigment is actually a red-violet colored quinaquidone, and the lower is indanthrone blue.  The doll is painted with the same pigments.  The feathery yarn is wool feathers, and the lace inscription (not shown) says “she fell to the earth from the cracks in the sky.” (inspired by Leonard Cohen’s line “the cracks are where the light gets in.”

"She fell to the earth through the cracks in the sky", copyright 2008 by Lynn Whitlark; quinaquidone violete and indanthrone, muslin doll, feathered yarn, brass grommets, and chrome fittings.

"She fell to the earth through the cracks in the sky", copyright 2008 by Lynn Whitlark; quinaquidone violete and indanthrone, muslin doll, feathered yarn, brass grommets, and chrome fittings.

Carrie's doll, Sassy, by Lynn Whitlark

Carrie's doll, Sassy, by Lynn Whitlark

Patrice's doll, Elyrium, by Lynn Whitlark

Patrice's doll, Elyrium, by Lynn Whitlark

The Puzzle of Personal Statements About Art

Undersea Night, copyright 2010 by Lynn Whitlrak

Undersea Night, copyright 2010 by Lynn Whitlrak

I’ve spent a considerable amount of time lately listening to contemporary artists.

It’s a dizzying task.  The world is a crowded place these days — and art as a means of expression and an attempt to make contact has reached epidemic proportions.

Modern art began with the Impressionists.  Or about there.  Prior to the impressionists, artists painted classical subjects — basically, they either painted portraits, or they illustrated the Bible and a few other classic works of sacred literature including the classical mythologies.  But there came a day when artists in the throws of political revolution all around them decided to hold a little revolution of their own and paint from real life.  Instead of posed attempts at perfection, they started painting real people — warts and deformities and all. Then they started painting fleeting light. Fleeting smiles.  Fleeting glances  Fleeting life.  It was about the beauty of the moment.  It was about time — rather than timelessness.

Since then, art has been in a fast flowing tumble from the Impressionists and the  Expressionists to the swift gallop into true Modernism and its quirks and personal glitches like Art Deco and Art Nouveau, Dadaism, Surrealism,  Abstract Expressionism, and on into Pop Art, Op Art and the Post Modern Deconstructionists.

But throughout all these Modern and Post Modern twists and turns, I hear statements by artists like “My art has to do with ____.”  Or, “I think my art is informed by _______.”  “I’m interested in _______.”  “People see a lot of ______ in my work.”

All this made me feel a little uncomfortable.

First, let me be clear.  It’s not that I have a problem telling people my opinion, or even telling people what to think.  I’m more than happy to do that.   But when I hear someone say “My work is about masks and facades,” or “I’m interested in machines that produce sound,” it makes me look at my work and try to figure out if there is that kind of flat statement that describes it.

So I start here with what it is that interests me about my painting.  I am interested in pigment more than color (and I’m VERY interested in color.)  I’m interested in water and its effects on paper and pigment and botanical gums, humectants, oils, spirits, and minerals.  I am interested in the elements of painting — the water, the evaporation, the materials, — and then heat and fire and how those things effect all the other elements.

Which starts to sound like I’m more chemist and experimentalist than painter.

That would be true except for one thing — my head is full of a life lived with a prevailing idea — The mind speaks fluent METAPHOR.  The conscious mind speaks in language.  But the unconscious mind speaks metaphor.  And where there’s a transmitter — there is always a receiver.

With that firmly in mind, I look back at the list of things that interest me about my own art.  Water is the realm of the unconscious.  Whether you’re talking Freud or Jung or Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm, water is where the unconscious works its magic and its sorcery.  Water is what dreams are born of and where mystery and fantasy are worked, reworked and retooled.

Pigments, mediums, (yes, I know, it’s media — but media means something else outside the rigors of singular and plural language…) paper pulp, and chemistry are not only the things the paintings are made of — they are the things I am made of.  I’m basically dirt and water and minerals and fibrous connective tissue.   The elements of the painting are the elements of flesh and blood — a lot of carbon, a lot of iron oxide, a few odd chemicals and minerals, and a lot of liquid.

The not-so-passive-as-it-appears component of my art is air.  I live in a desert.  At least for the moment. (if climate change keeps up its “global weirding” and flooding our desert every year, we may shift to a tropical rain forest over the next couple of decades.) The result is, dry air, humid air, wind and breeze transform pigment and mediums on paper into color and light and shadow and meaning.  Metaphorically, air is what it has always been — breath.  Life.

And from the first days when I put pigment on paper (or wood, or cork, or glass, or leather…) I also put fire there.  This is not so unusual.  Many of the pigments which are traditional to artists are exposed to fire — so we get burnt umber and burnt sienna etc.  Even modern chemical pigments are burned, boiled, roasted, toasted, fired and otherwise cooked to produce variations in color.  I just do some of it on the paper or wood itself with my little (or not so little) torch.  Metaphorically, fire has to do with energy — and energy is what transforms.  We are put through trials of fire.  We burn with desire (or hatred.)  Smoke is the evidence of creativity and invention.

So as it happens, my work is about something.  It is informed by something.  I am interested in communication — and if communication between unconscious minds is going to happen, it is going to happen by way of metaphor.  My art is about unconscious communication.  It is a means of induction and production of an altered state.

*****************************************************

09/12/13

Nearly 4 years after first writing this “statement about my art” — I find it is stilL (or more) true, except that this year, I moved from the desert to the Pacific Northwest.  The Oregon Coast, to be specific.  I’ve moved from the breath of the arid Texas Panhandle, to the water-filled breath of the ocean.  I am now within a few hundred yards of where the earth ceases, and the wide, deep, cold, and life-filled Pacific Ocean begins.

As metaphors go — that’s a big, wide and deep one.  If water represents the unconscious mind — I am now close enough to see it, feel it, smell it, hear it and taste it 24 hours a day.  The air is full of it.  You can’t take a breath without breathing it in.  The unconscious is not so much just below the surface as it is on the surface, around the surface, covering the like a transparent blanket….  Water — the ocean of it — effects every single thing that happens here.

And as if that weren’t enough, it rains ALL THE TIME here from October until April.  It rains from May to September, too — but not all the time.  And hardly at all (by comparison) in July or August.

And then there’s the fog and the mist and the spray and the nearly 100% humidity.

And even on days when the Coastal Mountain range  has temperatures in the high 70s and 80s — the temperature by the northern waters of the Pacific — where I am in that last 1/4 – 1/2 miles before the shore — is still hovering at about 60 degrees in the full heat of the day.  And when it’s warm and summery in the mountains, or in the Willamette Valley on the other side — that just draws a heavy coating of mist and fog in from the ocean that socks us in to a fog bank….

So to recap, I am next to water.  breathing water, drenched in water, misted by water, sprayed by water, seeing the world through pea-soup thick water that engulfs everything.

In metaphorical terms — all of that describes what I am doing in my art these days.  When complete strangers look at my paintings, they talk about how deep they appear.  Like looking into a pool of water.  They talk about depths and layers and intricacy and hidden things and secrets….  There are paintings just below the surface of my paintings.

Late Summer Storm

Late Summer Storm

Antique Kimono

Antique Kimono

More paintings recorded….

Some of these are new, others are 3, 4, and 5 years old — some are just better photographed versions of other pics — but this gives me a second page of storage.

I need better images of paintings that are selling, because I won’t have access to them in the future — but I’m not doing a very good job of photographing them so far…

In some cases — like the painting “Whirlwind” — the colors are so layered that the depth of the painting has proven impossible for me to photograph well.  The nature of the chemical colors in combination with the earth colors and ground mineral is that the chemicals reflect light very differently to the camera than to the eye.  This is true in other paintings as well — like “Violent Autumn” and “Dragons” — which I hesitated to include here at all but for having some record of them.

In the painting “Dragons” especially, the mineral purpurite hardly photographs at all.  Regardless of how I mickey with the image, the purpurite turns black, or very close to it.

The painting “Untitled 1st 2nd” (it’s a long story) is very odd and shows its oddness well when photographed.  It is unusual because it uses only 2 pigments (not ones I have ground, but from commercial paintmakers) – Winsor Newton Perylene Green (which is made from a black perylene pigment,) and Daniel Smith Quinaquidone Coral which is made from a quinaquidone rose pigment. The black pigments shows up as green, while the green combined with the coral produces a deep mauve leaning toward violet. Green and coral should not make violet — but perhaps a black pigment and a rose pigment do….